- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Bitcoin Set to Skyrocket: Michael Saylor Predicts $150K Milestone by End of 2025
Key Takeaways
- Michael Saylor, co-founder of MicroStrategy, forecasts Bitcoin reaching $150K by the end of 2025, driven by positive U.S. regulatory shifts.
- Recent regulatory embraces, like the SEC’s stance on tokenized securities and support for stablecoins, signal a bullish era for the crypto industry.
- Despite a market crash triggered by tariff announcements, analysts remain optimistic about long-term Bitcoin price trends amid potential U.S.-China trade resolutions.
- MicroStrategy’s strong position in Bitcoin holdings positions it as a key player, with potential S&P 500 inclusion on the horizon.
- Easing trade tensions and upcoming economic events could spark a significant rebound in crypto asset prices.
Imagine standing at the edge of a vast ocean, watching waves crash and recede, each one building momentum for the next big surge. That’s a bit like the Bitcoin market right now—full of ebbs and flows, but with experts like Michael Saylor spotting a massive wave on the horizon. As someone who’s deeply invested in the crypto world, Saylor isn’t just guessing; he’s basing his bold prediction on real shifts happening in regulations and global economics. Let’s dive into why he believes Bitcoin could hit $150,000 by the end of 2025, and what that means for everyday investors like you.
Saylor, the co-founder of MicroStrategy—the company holding the largest Bitcoin treasury out there—shared his optimistic outlook during a recent chat at the Money 20/20 conference in Las Vegas. He didn’t hold back, calling the past 12 months some of the best in the industry’s history. Think about it: regulatory hurdles that once felt like impenetrable walls are starting to crumble, paving the way for smoother sailing in the digital asset space.
Why Regulatory Changes Are Fueling Bitcoin’s Potential Surge
Picture regulations as the weather forecast for your investment journey. A stormy outlook keeps you indoors, but clear skies invite you to venture out. Over the last year, the U.S. has seen a remarkable pivot toward friendlier policies for cryptocurrencies. Saylor pointed to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) warming up to tokenized securities, which essentially means traditional assets can now be digitized and traded more efficiently on blockchain platforms. It’s like turning a clunky old car into a sleek electric vehicle—faster, more accessible, and ready for the future.
Adding to that, there’s been vocal support from high-level officials. The U.S. Treasury Secretary highlighted stablecoins as a tool to maintain the dollar’s global dominance, a move that underscores how crypto isn’t just a fringe idea anymore; it’s becoming integral to economic strategy. Saylor summed it up nicely, noting that these developments create a fertile ground for growth. His expectation? Bitcoin climbing to around $150,000 by year’s end, a view echoed by equity analysts tracking MicroStrategy and the broader Bitcoin ecosystem.
This isn’t pie-in-the-sky thinking. MicroStrategy’s own trajectory backs it up. As the biggest corporate holder of Bitcoin, the company has turned its treasury into a powerhouse, amassing holdings that dwarf many competitors. Analysts have even tipped MicroStrategy for inclusion in the S&P 500 following strong quarterly earnings, which would be like getting a VIP pass to the big leagues of finance. It’s evidence that Bitcoin isn’t just surviving; it’s thriving in institutional circles.
Navigating the Recent Market Crash and Bitcoin Price Pressures
Of course, no ocean voyage is without its storms. The crypto market recently took a hit, with prices dipping amid broader economic jitters. It all started when announcements of 100% additional tariffs on China sparked fears of macroeconomic shake-ups. Investors panicked, leading to a crash that felt like a sudden squall disrupting calm waters. But here’s where perspective matters: analysts from various quarters argue this was more of a short-term blip than a long-term downturn.
Think of it like a rollercoaster ride—those steep drops are thrilling (or terrifying), but the track always levels out if the fundamentals are sound. Experts noted that the crash stemmed from technical factors, leaving the upward trend intact. They’re betting on a rebound, especially with signs of easing tensions between the U.S. and China. Officials from both sides have dialed back the aggressive talk, hinting at negotiations that could stabilize global trade.
In fact, there was a notable turnaround when it was confirmed that a meeting between U.S. and Chinese leaders would happen at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Seoul. Adding fuel to the fire, announcements of a substantial trade deal framework have analysts buzzing. It’s the kind of news that could send asset prices soaring, much like how a peace treaty ends a war and kickstarts economic booms.
Bitcoin Price Forecasts Amid Global Economic Shifts
Saylor’s $150,000 prediction isn’t isolated. It’s part of a chorus of voices seeing Bitcoin’s value propelled by these macroeconomic tailwinds. If a trade deal materializes alongside potential interest rate cuts, the market could indeed get “crazy,” as one prominent investor put it. Compare this to historical bull runs: back in previous cycles, regulatory green lights and economic recoveries have often led to exponential gains. For instance, after past market dips, Bitcoin has rebounded with vigor, rewarding those who held steady.
To make this relatable, consider Bitcoin like a digital gold rush. Just as prospectors flocked to California in the 1800s, today’s investors are mining opportunities in crypto. But unlike those dusty trails, platforms like WEEX make it seamless to join in. WEEX stands out with its user-friendly interface and robust security, aligning perfectly with the growing demand for reliable crypto trading. It’s not just about buying and holding; it’s about having a trusted partner that enhances your strategy, much like MicroStrategy has done on a corporate scale. This brand alignment with innovation and stability positions WEEX as a go-to for anyone eyeing Bitcoin’s potential surge, offering tools that simplify complex trades without the headaches.
Latest Updates and Social Buzz on Bitcoin’s Trajectory
Fast-forward to today—October 30, 2025—and the conversation around Bitcoin is hotter than ever. On Google, the most frequently searched questions revolve around “What is Bitcoin’s price prediction for 2026?” and “How will U.S. regulations affect Bitcoin in 2025?” People are hungry for insights on whether Saylor’s forecast will hold, especially with the year winding down. Searches like “Best platforms to buy Bitcoin amid market volatility” are spiking, reflecting a desire for secure ways to navigate these waters.
Over on Twitter (now X), the buzz is electric. Discussions are dominated by topics like “Bitcoin to $150K: Realistic or Hype?” with users debating Saylor’s comments alongside real-time market moves. Hashtags related to trade deals and crypto regulations are trending, with influencers sharing threads on how easing U.S.-China tensions could be the catalyst. Just yesterday, a viral post from a well-known analyst read: “If the Fed cuts rates this week and the trade framework holds, Bitcoin could break $100K before December. #BitcoinSurge.” Official announcements aren’t lagging either; a recent tweet from the U.S. Treasury echoed support for stablecoins, reinforcing Saylor’s points and sparking threads with thousands of retweets.
These updates aren’t just noise—they’re grounded in ongoing developments. For example, as of this morning, reports confirm continued dialogue on the trade front, with economists predicting positive ripple effects for assets like Bitcoin. It’s like watching puzzle pieces fall into place, each one strengthening the case for that $150,000 milestone.
MicroStrategy’s Role in Shaping Bitcoin’s Future
Diving deeper, MicroStrategy’s story is a compelling analogy for Bitcoin’s resilience. Founded by Saylor, the company has bet big on Bitcoin, treating it as a core asset rather than a side hustle. Their holdings, unmatched in scale, serve as a real-world example of corporate adoption driving value. Analysts project that post-earnings strength could land them in the S&P 500, a move that would validate Bitcoin’s place in mainstream finance. It’s like a small startup suddenly going public and skyrocketing—proof that vision pays off.
Saylor’s enthusiasm is infectious, isn’t it? He sees these regulatory wins as the dawn of a new era, where Bitcoin evolves from a speculative play to a staple in portfolios. Contrast this with earlier skepticism: years ago, crypto was dismissed as volatile fluff. Now, with institutional backing and policy support, it’s gaining credibility. Evidence abounds—look at how tokenized securities are streamlining markets, or how stablecoins are bolstering the dollar. These aren’t hypotheticals; they’re happening now, bolstering forecasts like Saylor’s.
Investor Sentiment and the Path Forward for Bitcoin
As we approach the end of 2025, investor sentiment is a mix of caution and excitement. The recent crash reminded everyone of crypto’s volatility, but it also highlighted opportunities for those who buy the dip. Analysts are confident in a turnaround, pointing to historical patterns where trade resolutions have ignited rallies. Imagine Bitcoin as a phoenix, rising stronger after each flame-out. That’s the narrative playing out, supported by data from past cycles where prices doubled or tripled post-recovery.
For readers like you, this means staying informed and strategic. Platforms that align with this momentum, such as WEEX, offer more than just transactions—they provide insights and tools that make sense of the chaos. WEEX’s commitment to transparency and low-fee trading mirrors the industry’s shift toward accessibility, making it easier to capitalize on predictions like Saylor’s without unnecessary risks. It’s this kind of brand alignment that builds trust, ensuring you’re not just riding the wave but steering it.
Wrapping this up, Saylor’s vision for Bitcoin at $150,000 isn’t just a number—it’s a testament to the maturing crypto landscape. With regulatory tailwinds, easing global tensions, and institutional muscle, the stage is set for something big. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or dipping your toes in, keeping an eye on these developments could be your ticket to the next big surge. The ocean’s waves are building; are you ready to surf?
FAQ
What Makes Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin Prediction Credible?
Saylor’s forecast draws from his role at MicroStrategy, the top Bitcoin holder, and is backed by analyst consensus on regulatory and economic positives.
How Have Recent Trade Tensions Affected Bitcoin Prices?
Tariff announcements caused a short-term crash, but analysts see it as temporary, with potential deals likely to drive a rebound.
Why Are Regulations Key to Bitcoin’s Growth?
Shifts like SEC support for tokenized securities and stablecoin endorsements create a stable environment, boosting investor confidence.
What Role Does MicroStrategy Play in the Bitcoin Market?
As the largest corporate holder, MicroStrategy influences trends and is eyed for S&P 500 inclusion, signaling Bitcoin’s mainstream appeal.
How Can Investors Prepare for Bitcoin’s Potential Surge?
Stay updated on economic news, use reliable platforms like WEEX for trading, and focus on long-term trends over short-term volatility.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App