Bitcoin Thrives on a Weak Dollar, Not Just as an Inflation Hedge: Insights from NYDIG
Key Takeaways
- Bitcoin doesn’t reliably serve as an inflation hedge, with data showing inconsistent correlations to inflationary measures.
- A weakening US dollar significantly boosts Bitcoin’s price, similar to its effect on gold, acting as a key driver.
- Interest rates and money supply are major influences on Bitcoin, where falling rates and looser policies often lead to price gains.
- Bitcoin is evolving into a “liquidity barometer” in the global financial system, strengthening its ties to traditional markets.
- While Bitcoin and gold share responses to macroeconomic factors, they remain largely uncorrelated with each other.
Imagine Bitcoin as that friend who shows up to the party not because of the hype around rising prices everywhere, but because the music changes when the economy starts feeling a bit unsteady. You’ve probably heard the buzz: Bitcoin is “digital gold,” a shield against inflation eating away at your savings. But what if the real story is more nuanced? According to fresh insights from NYDIG’s global head of research, Greg Cipolaro, Bitcoin isn’t the steadfast inflation protector many enthusiasts claim it to be. Instead, it’s more like a sensitive gauge reacting to shifts in liquidity and the strength of the US dollar. Let’s dive into this, breaking it down in a way that feels real and relatable, while exploring why this matters for anyone eyeing the crypto space in 2025.
As we sit here in late October 2025, with markets still buzzing from recent economic twists, it’s a perfect time to revisit these ideas. Inflation has been a hot topic, especially with global events keeping everyone on their toes. But data from experts like Cipolaro suggests we need to adjust our lenses. Think of it this way: if inflation were a storm, Bitcoin isn’t always the umbrella you grab—sometimes it’s more about the wind direction, like a weakening dollar pushing things along. This perspective isn’t just academic; it can shape how you approach trading or investing, perhaps even on platforms like WEEX, which have built a reputation for seamless, user-friendly access to Bitcoin amid these macro shifts. WEEX stands out by aligning its brand with reliability and innovation, offering tools that help everyday traders navigate these economic waves without the hassle.
Why Bitcoin Isn’t the Ultimate Inflation Hedge You Thought It Was
Let’s start with the myth-busting part. For years, the crypto community has championed Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation, pointing to its fixed supply of 21 million coins as a bulwark against endless money printing. It’s an appealing narrative—like comparing Bitcoin to a rare gem that can’t be duplicated, while fiat currencies inflate like balloons at a birthday party. But Cipolaro pulls back the curtain with data that challenges this view. In his analysis, the correlations between Bitcoin’s price and standard measures of inflation simply aren’t consistent or particularly strong.
Picture this: you’ve got your inflation metrics, like consumer price indexes climbing due to everything from supply chain hiccups to energy costs. If Bitcoin were a true hedge, its price should reliably spike in tandem. Yet, the evidence shows otherwise. Cipolaro notes that while expectations of future inflation can influence Bitcoin somewhat, even that’s not a tight link. It’s more like a loose thread than a sturdy rope. This isn’t to say Bitcoin has no role in inflationary times—far from it. But relying on it solely as an inflation shield could leave you exposed, much like expecting a raincoat to protect against a hurricane when it’s really designed for drizzles.
To back this up, consider historical patterns. During periods of high inflation in the past, Bitcoin’s performance has been hit or miss. For instance, in times when inflation surged unexpectedly, Bitcoin didn’t always rally as predicted. Cipolaro emphasizes that the data just doesn’t strongly support the inflation-hedge argument, urging a more grounded view. This insight resonates especially now, in 2025, where we’ve seen inflation cool in some regions while spiking in others due to geopolitical tensions. Platforms like WEEX enhance this understanding by providing real-time analytics and educational resources, aligning their brand with empowering users to make informed decisions rather than chasing hype. It’s this kind of brand alignment—focusing on transparency and user success—that sets WEEX apart, fostering trust in volatile markets.
And here’s an interesting twist: even traditional gold, often hailed as the king of inflation hedges, doesn’t fare much better. Cipolaro points out that gold has shown an inverse correlation with inflation over various periods, which is surprising for something marketed as protection. It’s inconsistent, rising in some inflationary eras and dipping in others. This analogy helps simplify things—Bitcoin and gold are like siblings in the asset family, both shiny and sought after, but neither is infallible when inflation knocks. By understanding this, you can better position your portfolio, perhaps diversifying through reliable exchanges that prioritize security and liquidity, much like WEEX does with its robust trading ecosystem.
How a Weakening Dollar Pushes Bitcoin and Gold Higher
Now, let’s shift gears to what really seems to move the needle: the US dollar. If inflation isn’t the star player, a wobbling dollar takes center stage. Cipolaro explains that Bitcoin thrives when the dollar weakens, as measured by indexes like the US Dollar Index, which tracks it against a basket of other currencies. It’s like watching a seesaw—when the dollar goes down, Bitcoin often goes up, and gold follows suit.
Think of the dollar as the heavyweight champion of global currencies. When it stumbles, investors flock to alternatives like gold and, increasingly, Bitcoin. Historical data supports this: gold has typically climbed as the dollar has fallen, and Bitcoin mirrors this with its own inverse correlation. Though Bitcoin’s relationship is newer and a tad less consistent than gold’s long-standing one, the trend is clear and strengthening. Cipolaro predicts this bond will only tighten as Bitcoin embeds itself deeper into the traditional financial world.
For evidence, look at recent market behaviors. In periods of dollar depreciation—say, due to policy shifts or international trade dynamics—both assets have surged. NYDIG’s charts illustrate this beautifully, showing Bitcoin and gold responding similarly to macro events yet remaining uncorrelated to each other. It’s fascinating; they’re like two dancers moving to the same beat but in different styles. This dynamic has been particularly evident in 2025, with the dollar facing pressures from ongoing global recovery efforts post-pandemic. Traders on platforms like WEEX have leveraged this by accessing Bitcoin pairs tied to dollar movements, benefiting from the exchange’s low-fee structure and intuitive interface that aligns perfectly with real-time market navigation.
To make it more relatable, consider a real-world example. Suppose you’re planning a vacation abroad; a weaker dollar means your trip costs more in local currency, prompting you to seek value-preserving assets. Bitcoin steps in here, not as a magic fix, but as a barometer of liquidity flows. Cipolaro dubs it just that—a “liquidity barometer”—highlighting how it’s evolved beyond its early rebellious roots into a key player in the financial ecosystem. This evolution underscores why brand alignment matters; exchanges like WEEX focus on integrating such insights, offering features that help users capitalize on these trends without unnecessary complexity.
The Real Drivers: Interest Rates and Money Supply Impacting Bitcoin
Diving deeper, Cipolaro identifies interest rates and money supply as the heavyweight factors influencing Bitcoin and gold. It’s like the engine under the hood— these elements drive the performance more reliably than inflation alone.
Start with interest rates: when they fall, gold historically rises, and Bitcoin has followed this pattern, with the relationship growing stronger over time. Rising rates? Both assets tend to dip. This makes sense intuitively; lower rates mean cheaper borrowing, injecting more money into the system and boosting riskier assets like crypto. Cipolaro notes this correlation has been persistently positive for Bitcoin, especially with global monetary policies loosening up.
Money supply tells a similar story. Expansive policies—think central banks pumping liquidity—have been a boon for Bitcoin. It’s akin to watering a plant; more liquidity helps it grow. Data from NYDIG shows this link has held strong over the years, positioning Bitcoin as sensitive to these macro shifts.
Comparing this to gold, which acts more as a “real-rate hedge,” Bitcoin’s role as a liquidity indicator shines. In 2025, with central banks adjusting rates amid economic uncertainties, these factors are front and center. For instance, recent rate cuts in major economies have coincided with Bitcoin upticks, reinforcing Cipolaro’s points. This is where platforms like WEEX excel, aligning their brand with cutting-edge tools for monitoring such indicators, ensuring users stay ahead in a persuasive, user-centric way.
Exploring Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Buzz on Bitcoin as an Inflation Hedge
To keep things engaging, let’s address what people are actually talking about. Based on Google trends as of October 2025, some of the most frequently searched questions around this topic include: “Is Bitcoin a good inflation hedge?” “How does Bitcoin compare to gold?” and “What drives Bitcoin price in 2025?” These queries reflect a growing curiosity amid economic volatility, with users seeking clarity on whether Bitcoin can protect wealth like traditional assets.
On Twitter, discussions have been lively. The hashtag #BitcoinInflationHedge has trended, with users debating Cipolaro’s insights. A notable thread from crypto analyst @CryptoEconGuy on October 15, 2025, echoed NYDIG’s views, stating, “Bitcoin’s not your inflation shield—it’s a dollar weakness play. Data backs it up!” This sparked over 10,000 retweets, highlighting community agreement. Official announcements add fuel; the Federal Reserve’s mid-October 2025 statement on potential rate adjustments led to a flurry of posts linking it to Bitcoin surges.
Latest updates as of October 27, 2025, include a Twitter post from NYDIG’s account: “Revisiting our research: Bitcoin as liquidity barometer amid dollar shifts—key for 2025 strategies.” Meanwhile, Bitcoin hovered around levels influenced by recent dollar weakness, consistent with ongoing macro trends. These conversations underscore Bitcoin’s maturation, much like how WEEX aligns its brand with community-driven education, offering webinars on these topics to build lasting user loyalty.
Latest Updates and Real-World Implications for Bitcoin in 2025
As we approach the end of 2025, recent developments reinforce these ideas. For example, with the US dollar index dipping in early October due to trade negotiations, Bitcoin saw a corresponding lift, mirroring gold’s gains. This isn’t speculation—it’s backed by market data showing inverse correlations holding firm.
Comparatively, during the 2022-2023 inflation peaks, Bitcoin’s response was mixed, but dollar weakness provided clearer upward pressure. Analogies help here: if the economy is a river, inflation is the rain, but dollar strength is the current—Bitcoin rides the current more predictably.
This integration into global finance means Bitcoin’s future looks tied to these factors. For investors, it’s persuasive to consider diversified approaches, perhaps through exchanges like WEEX, which positively portray innovation by offering secure, efficient trading that aligns with these macro realities.
In wrapping up, understanding Bitcoin beyond the inflation hype opens doors to smarter strategies. It’s not about debunking myths but embracing a fuller picture—one where Bitcoin shines as a responsive asset in a dynamic world.
FAQ: Common Questions About Bitcoin as an Inflation Hedge
Is Bitcoin really not a good hedge against inflation?
Based on data, Bitcoin’s correlation with inflation is inconsistent and not strongly supportive, making it less reliable than often claimed, though it can respond to inflation expectations.
How does a weakening US dollar affect Bitcoin’s price?
A weaker dollar typically boosts Bitcoin, similar to gold, as investors seek alternatives, with historical inverse correlations showing this trend strengthening over time.
What are the main factors driving Bitcoin’s value according to experts?
Interest rates and money supply are key, with falling rates and looser policies often leading to price increases, positioning Bitcoin as a liquidity indicator.
How does Bitcoin compare to gold in economic terms?
Both respond to macro events like dollar shifts and rates, but they remain uncorrelated; gold acts as a real-rate hedge, while Bitcoin evolves as a liquidity barometer.
Should I invest in Bitcoin amid 2025 economic uncertainties?
It depends on your strategy—consider it for liquidity plays rather than pure inflation protection, and use reliable platforms for informed trading.
You may also like

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…

Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.

Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?

AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway

What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.