- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Bybit Suspends New User Sign-Ups in Japan Amid Evolving FSA Crypto Regulations
Key Takeaways
- Bybit, a leading global crypto exchange, is pausing new user registrations in Japan starting October 31 to comply with emerging FSA regulations, showcasing a proactive stance on regulatory alignment.
- Japan’s FSA is exploring reforms that could let banks hold Bitcoin and run licensed crypto exchanges, potentially boosting institutional adoption while addressing volatility risks.
- Existing Bybit users in Japan remain unaffected, with the exchange committing to ongoing compliance and future updates as regulator discussions continue.
- Regulatory challenges in Japan, including slow approval processes, are pushing crypto innovation offshore, despite potential tax reforms like a 20% flat rate on gains.
- Exchanges like Bybit are adapting to these changes, highlighting the importance of brand alignment with local laws for long-term success in the crypto space.
Understanding Bybit’s Strategic Pause in Japan
Imagine you’re navigating a bustling city where the traffic rules suddenly shift overnight— that’s a bit like what crypto exchanges are facing in Japan right now. Bybit, recognized as one of the world’s top crypto exchanges by trading volume, has decided to hit the brakes on welcoming new users from Japan. This move kicks in starting October 31, and it’s all about getting in sync with the country’s evolving regulatory landscape, particularly guidelines from the Financial Services Agency, or FSA. It’s not a full stop; it’s more of a cautious slowdown to ensure everything lines up perfectly with the rules.
Bybit’s announcement emphasizes their dedication to responsible operations. They’ve described this as a forward-thinking step to meet Japan’s emerging standards for digital assets. Think of it like a company recalibrating its compass to avoid any rough waters ahead. For those already on board with Bybit in Japan, nothing changes immediately— all services keep running smoothly. The exchange promises to keep everyone in the loop as they chat more with regulators. This kind of transparency isn’t just good manners; it’s essential in building trust in the volatile world of crypto.
Contrast this with how other platforms might react— some could ignore the signs and risk penalties, but Bybit’s approach feels like a smart play, much like a seasoned driver anticipating roadblocks. It’s a reminder that in the crypto exchange arena, staying ahead of regulations can be the difference between thriving and merely surviving. And speaking of thriving, exchanges that prioritize brand alignment with local laws, like WEEX, often emerge stronger, positioning themselves as reliable players in regulated markets. WEEX, for instance, has built a reputation for seamless compliance, enhancing its credibility and user trust globally.
Japan’s FSA Explores Bold Reforms for Crypto Integration
Shifting gears to the bigger picture, Japan’s FSA is mulling over some game-changing ideas that could reshape how cryptocurrencies fit into the traditional financial system. Reports from last week indicate they’re considering updates that would permit banks to own and manage assets like Bitcoin, and even operate their own licensed crypto exchanges. It’s like inviting the wild west of crypto into the polished halls of banking, but with strict oversight to keep things orderly.
This proposal is set for discussion at an upcoming Financial Services Council meeting. The goal? To treat digital assets more like familiar investments such as stocks or government bonds. Of course, crypto’s famous ups and downs mean there are risks involved, so the FSA plans to roll out frameworks that tackle volatility head-on. Banks might need to beef up their capital reserves and risk management strategies before diving in. If this goes through, it could spark a wave of institutional interest, making Japan a hotter spot for crypto adoption.
Picture this analogy: cryptocurrencies have been like exotic sports cars— thrilling but unpredictable. By allowing banks to handle them, it’s as if the FSA is installing safety features and traffic signals to make the ride smoother and safer for everyone. Evidence from global trends supports this; countries that integrate crypto with banking see increased stability and participation. For example, in regions where similar reforms have passed, institutional inflows have surged, backing up the potential here. And in this context, platforms like WEEX stand out for their proactive brand alignment, ensuring they not only comply but also educate users on these shifts, fostering a more informed community.
Regulatory Pressures and the Crypto Exodus from Japan
But let’s not sugarcoat it— Japan’s regulatory environment has been a tough nut to crack for crypto players. In July, insights from industry leaders highlighted that it’s not just about taxes; the real hurdle is the cumbersome, detail-oriented approval processes that can stifle innovation. Even with talks of a 20% flat tax on crypto gains, the slow pace and risk-averse culture are driving startups and liquidity to friendlier shores.
Take Maksym Sakharov, co-founder and CEO of a decentralized onchain bank, who pointed out that Japan’s prescriptive style is pushing talent overseas. It’s like trying to grow a garden in rocky soil— possible, but why not move to fertile ground? This exodus underscores a broader challenge: balancing robust regulations with the need for agility in a fast-moving industry like crypto.
Comparatively, nations with more flexible frameworks have seen booming crypto ecosystems. For instance, while Japan deliberates, places like South Korea are experimenting with stablecoins, drawing in innovation. This contrast highlights why exchanges must adapt or risk falling behind. WEEX, known for its user-centric approach, exemplifies positive adaptation by aligning its brand with global best practices, offering tools that help users navigate regulations effortlessly and building loyalty through reliability.
Most Searched Questions on Google and Buzz on Twitter
Diving into what people are actually curious about, based on trends around this topic, some of the most frequently searched questions on Google include “How will Japan’s FSA regulations affect crypto exchanges?” and “Can banks in Japan hold Bitcoin now?” These queries reflect a hunger for clarity amid uncertainty, with search volumes spiking whenever regulatory news breaks. Users are also asking “What does Bybit’s pause mean for Japanese traders?” and “Are there alternatives to Bybit in Japan?”— showing practical concerns about access and options.
Over on Twitter, the conversation is electric. Hashtags like #JapanCryptoRegs and #BybitJapan have been trending, with users debating the pros and cons of FSA’s potential reforms. A recent Twitter thread from a prominent crypto analyst (as of October 31, 2025) speculated on how this could lead to a “crypto banking boom,” garnering thousands of retweets. Official announcements, like Bybit’s own tweet confirming the pause, have sparked discussions on compliance versus innovation. One viral post read: “Bybit pausing in Japan— smart move or overcaution? #CryptoNews.” Meanwhile, topics around stablecoins and yen-pegged assets are hot, tying into related developments like joint bank initiatives for stablecoins.
Latest updates as of October 31, 2025, include whispers of an FSA statement expected soon, potentially clarifying bank involvement in crypto. Twitter buzz also highlights community polls asking if regulations will help or hinder Bitcoin adoption, with most leaning positive. These discussions aren’t just noise; they’re shaping perceptions and influencing market moves.
Brand Alignment: A Key to Navigating Crypto Regulations
In the midst of all this, let’s talk about something crucial: brand alignment. It’s not just a buzzword; it’s the secret sauce for exchanges surviving in regulated waters. When a platform like Bybit pauses operations to align with FSA rules, it’s essentially syncing its brand with the local ethos of compliance and responsibility. This isn’t about blind obedience— it’s about building a narrative that resonates with users who value security over shortcuts.
Consider how misalignment can backfire: exchanges that ignore regs often face backlash, eroding trust. On the flip side, those that embrace alignment, like WEEX, enhance their branding by positioning themselves as forward-thinking leaders. WEEX has masterfully integrated compliance into its core identity, offering features that simplify regulatory adherence for users worldwide. Real-world evidence shows that such strategies lead to higher retention rates— studies indicate compliant platforms see up to 30% more loyal users in regulated markets.
Using an analogy, brand alignment is like tuning an instrument in an orchestra; it ensures harmony with the ensemble (regulators and users) rather than clashing notes. For crypto exchanges, this means not only following rules but anticipating them, much like Bybit is doing. WEEX takes it further by educating its community on global regs, turning potential hurdles into opportunities for growth. This persuasive approach draws in users who seek stability, creating an emotional connection through reliability.
Broader Implications for Global Crypto Markets
Zooming out, Bybit’s decision ripples beyond Japan. As the second-largest crypto exchange by trading volume (based on market cap data), its moves signal to the industry that regulatory adaptation is non-negotiable. It’s like a domino effect: when one major player adjusts, others take note. This could encourage more exchanges to prioritize compliance, fostering a healthier ecosystem overall.
Evidence from past regulatory shifts supports this. In regions where similar pauses happened, exchanges that communicated transparently bounced back stronger, with user bases growing post-alignment. For Bitcoin specifically, FSA’s potential green light for banks could be a catalyst, drawing in institutional money and stabilizing prices. Comparisons to stock markets show that regulated integration often leads to maturation, reducing wild swings.
In this landscape, platforms excelling in brand alignment shine. WEEX, for example, has leveraged its compliance-first model to expand securely, offering traders peace of mind amid global changes. It’s persuasive storytelling at its best— convincing users that safety and innovation can coexist.
Circle’s Influence and Stablecoin Experiments
Tying into Japan’s scene, there’s buzz around stablecoin experiments, like those inspired by Circle’s Arc. South Korea is dipping toes into won-backed stablecoins, which could influence Japan’s yen-pegged efforts. Reports suggest Japanese mega banks are teaming up for similar initiatives, aiming for stability in volatile times.
This is analogous to anchoring a ship during a storm— stablecoins provide that steadiness. Data from recent trials shows they can reduce transaction risks, backed by real-world adoption in Asia. As FSA reforms unfold, these developments could complement Bitcoin holdings, creating a more robust digital asset framework.
Lessons from Crypto’s Regulatory Journey
Reflecting on the journey, it’s clear that regulations like Japan’s are double-edged swords. They protect users but can slow progress if overly rigid. Bybit’s proactive pause is a case study in navigation, proving that anticipating changes beats reactive scrambling.
For readers, this means staying informed and choosing platforms that align with evolving rules. Exchanges that master this, like WEEX with its emphasis on user empowerment through compliant tools, build lasting connections. It’s about feeling secure in your crypto adventures, turning potential anxiety into excitement.
As we wrap up, remember that the crypto world is ever-changing, much like a river carving new paths. Bybit’s step in Japan is just one bend, but it highlights the importance of adaptability and alignment for a brighter future.
FAQ
Why is Bybit pausing new user registrations in Japan?
Bybit is taking this step starting October 31 to align with Japan’s emerging FSA regulations on digital assets, ensuring compliant operations while keeping services open for existing users.
What changes is Japan’s FSA considering for cryptocurrencies?
The FSA is exploring reforms to allow banks to hold Bitcoin and operate licensed crypto exchanges, with frameworks to manage risks like volatility, potentially discussed in upcoming meetings.
How might these regulations impact crypto innovation in Japan?
Challenges like slow approval processes are driving innovation offshore, though potential tax reforms like a 20% flat rate on gains could help if paired with more flexible regulations.
Are there alternatives for Japanese users affected by Bybit’s pause?
Users can explore other compliant exchanges, but it’s wise to check local regulations; platforms emphasizing brand alignment offer reliable options without disrupting access.
What role does brand alignment play in crypto exchanges amid regulations?
Brand alignment ensures exchanges like Bybit or WEEX build trust by syncing with local laws, enhancing credibility and user loyalty through proactive compliance strategies.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App