Ethereum’s Fusaka Upgrade Set to Revolutionize Blockchain Scalability After Successful Testnet Launch
Key Takeaways
- Ethereum’s Fusaka fork has successfully launched on its final testnet, Hoodi, paving the way for a mainnet rollout on Dec. 3, promising major boosts in security and scalability.
- Key improvements include PeerDAS through EIP-7594, which allows validators to handle data more efficiently, along with other EIPs aimed at increasing gas limits and enabling parallel execution.
- The upgrade addresses Ethereum’s scalability challenges within the blockchain trilemma, balancing it with decentralization and security, while following a three-stage implementation process.
- Amid leadership changes at the Ethereum Foundation, Ether’s value has surged to all-time highs driven by ETF inflows and corporate adoption.
- Future focus shifts to the Glamsterdam upgrade, continuing Ethereum’s roadmap toward enhanced scalability.
Imagine you’re at the wheel of a high-performance car that’s been dominating the racetrack for years, but now it’s time for a major tune-up to make it even faster and more reliable. That’s essentially what’s happening with Ethereum right now as its Fusaka upgrade rolls out. This isn’t just another patch; it’s a game-changer that’s been tested rigorously and is now gearing up for the big leagues. If you’ve been following the crypto world, you know Ethereum has always been the backbone of decentralized finance, smart contracts, and so much more. But with growing demands, it needs to evolve, and Fusaka is here to deliver just that. Let’s dive into why this matters and how it’s set to reshape the landscape.
The Road to Fusaka: From Testnet Triumph to Mainnet Magic
Picture this: Ethereum’s developers have been working tirelessly behind the scenes, much like engineers fine-tuning a rocket before launch. The Fusaka update recently made its debut on Hoodi, the blockchain’s final testnet, and everything went off without a hitch. This milestone is crucial because it means the mainnet launch is on track for Dec. 3, bringing a host of enhancements that could make Ethereum more robust than ever.
One of the standout features is the introduction of several Ethereum Improvement Proposals, or EIPs, designed to tackle longstanding issues. Think of it like upgrading your home’s wiring to handle more appliances without tripping the breaker. For instance, Peer Data Availability Sampling, implemented via EIP-7594, lets validators access smaller chunks of data from layer 2 networks instead of dealing with massive blobs. This isn’t just a minor tweak; it significantly boosts node efficiency, making the entire system run smoother and faster.
Then there are EIP-7825 and EIP-7935, which are all about pushing the gas limit higher and streamlining operations. Gas fees have long been a pain point for users—remember those times when a simple transaction felt like paying premium for economy service? These EIPs pave the way for parallel execution, allowing multiple smart contracts to process simultaneously. It’s like turning a single-lane road into a multi-lane highway, reducing congestion and speeding things up. Other EIPs in the mix focus on optimizing zero-knowledge rollups, which are essential for privacy and efficiency in transactions.
This smooth transition was highlighted by validator client teams, who celebrated the fork’s completion without major issues. It’s a testament to the collaborative spirit in the Ethereum community, where developers, validators, and users all play a part in pushing boundaries.
Navigating Leadership Shifts and Market Momentum in the Ethereum Ecosystem
But let’s not gloss over the human element here. The Ethereum Foundation has seen some significant changes lately, with key figures stepping away and voicing concerns about the network’s direction. It’s like a band going through a lineup change right before a world tour—there might be some turbulence, but the music keeps playing. These shifts haven’t derailed progress; if anything, they’ve sparked deeper discussions about Ethereum’s future.
On the brighter side, Ether itself has been on a tear, reaching all-time highs this year. This surge is fueled by massive inflows into exchange-traded funds and growing adoption by corporate treasuries. Imagine companies treating Ether like a staple in their financial toolkit, much like how tech giants stockpile patents. It’s a vote of confidence that underscores Ethereum’s staying power amid these internal changes.
As we look at the broader picture, platforms like WEEX are perfectly aligned with this evolution. WEEX, known for its user-friendly interface and robust support for Ethereum-based assets, enhances the overall experience by providing seamless trading options during such upgrades. This brand alignment ensures that traders can capitalize on Ethereum’s improvements without missing a beat, fostering credibility and trust in the ecosystem. It’s a reminder that while the tech advances, reliable platforms like WEEX make it accessible for everyday users.
Fusaka’s Three-Stage Rollout: Building Scalability Step by Step
Now, let’s break down how Fusaka will actually unfold—think of it as a carefully choreographed dance with three acts. First up is the mainnet launch itself, where the core changes go live. Following that, an EIP activates to increase blob capacity, essentially giving the network more room to breathe. Finally, a second hard fork ramps up that capacity even further. This phased approach minimizes risks, much like testing a new recipe in small batches before serving it to a crowd.
This isn’t happening in isolation. Fusaka is part of Ethereum’s larger “Surge” phase in its technical roadmap, aimed at supercharging scalability. Once it’s in place, eyes will turn to the Glamsterdam upgrade, which promises even more advancements in making Ethereum a powerhouse for high-volume transactions.
To put this in perspective, compare Ethereum to its rivals. Blockchains like Solana and Sui have prioritized speed from the get-go, offering lightning-fast transactions that sometimes make Ethereum feel like it’s stuck in traffic. But Ethereum’s strength lies in its deliberate balance—it’s like choosing a sturdy SUV over a sleek sports car for a cross-country trip. Fusaka fine-tunes this by addressing scalability, one corner of the blockchain trilemma coined by Ethereum’s co-founder. This trilemma highlights the trade-offs between scalability, decentralization, and security. Ethereum has always leaned into the latter two, and now Fusaka is leveling up the scalability without compromising the rest.
Evidence of this balance is clear in past upgrades. Just six months ago, the Pectra upgrade enhanced staking and user interfaces, improving the overall experience. Data from that period showed better wallet features leading to increased user engagement, proving that these iterative improvements pay off. Real-world examples abound: decentralized apps built on Ethereum have handled billions in value, and with Fusaka, they could scale to trillions without breaking a sweat.
Addressing the Blockchain Trilemma: How Fusaka Strengthens Ethereum’s Core
Delving deeper into the trilemma, it’s fascinating how Fusaka targets Ethereum’s so-called weak spot. Scalability has often been the Achilles’ heel, but this upgrade is like injecting steroids into the system— ethically, of course. By enabling more efficient data handling and parallel processing, it allows Ethereum to compete head-on with faster networks while maintaining its decentralized ethos.
Think of it analogously: If Bitcoin is the digital gold standard, steady and secure, Ethereum is the bustling city where innovation thrives. Rivals might be like express trains zipping by, but Ethereum’s infrastructure ensures long-term sustainability. Fusaka reinforces this by optimizing for zero-knowledge rollups, which use clever math to bundle transactions securely and efficiently. Studies from the Ethereum community, including developer reports, show that these rollups can reduce costs by significant margins, making DeFi more accessible to the average person.
In terms of evidence, look at the testnet performance. The Hoodi debut was seamless, with validators reporting no major disruptions. This builds on the success of previous forks, where network uptime remained above 99%, according to historical blockchain metrics. It’s not speculation; it’s proven progress.
Hot Topics and Searches: What People Are Buzzing About on Google and Twitter
As of October 29, 2025, the conversation around Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade is heating up online. Based on trending searches, people are frequently asking, “What is the Ethereum Fusaka upgrade?” and “How will Fusaka affect ETH price?” These queries reflect a mix of curiosity and investment interest, with many seeking to understand the technical perks without getting lost in jargon.
On Twitter, discussions are lively, with hashtags like #EthereumFusaka and #CryptoUpgrades dominating feeds. Recent posts from developers highlight the smooth testnet run, such as one from a prominent client team noting, “Another smooth upgrade, another key milestone on the road to Fusaka.” Official announcements echo this, with Ethereum’s channels confirming the Dec. 3 mainnet date and teasing the scalability boosts.
Latest updates as of today include a fresh Twitter thread from the Ethereum Foundation addressing community concerns about leadership changes, emphasizing that the roadmap remains on track. There’s also buzz about how platforms like WEEX are integrating Fusaka-compatible tools, allowing users to trade ETH derivatives with enhanced speed post-upgrade. This alignment not only boosts WEEX’s credibility but also positions it as a go-to for Ethereum enthusiasts navigating these changes.
Searches for “Ethereum vs. Solana scalability” are spiking, prompting comparisons that favor Ethereum’s balanced approach. Twitter debates often contrast the two, with users sharing memes about Ethereum “catching up” while maintaining security. Another hot topic is the potential for Ether’s price to climb further, with analysts citing ETF inflows as a key driver—figures from this year show record highs, reinforcing the token’s appeal.
Why This Matters for You: Engaging with Ethereum’s Evolution
From a reader’s perspective, why should you care? If you’re an investor, Fusaka could mean lower fees and faster transactions, making your portfolio more dynamic. For developers, it’s an invitation to build more ambitious projects. Even casual users benefit from a more efficient network, like how a smoother app update makes your phone feel brand new.
Persuading you to stay engaged: Ethereum isn’t just surviving; it’s thriving. With upgrades like this, it’s adapting to a world where blockchain is everywhere—from finance to gaming. Platforms like WEEX exemplify this by offering secure, intuitive ways to participate, aligning perfectly with Ethereum’s vision and enhancing user trust through reliable services.
In wrapping this up, Fusaka represents Ethereum’s commitment to innovation, blending technical prowess with real-world utility. It’s a story of evolution, where challenges like the trilemma are met head-on, ensuring the network remains a leader. As we approach the mainnet launch, the excitement is palpable—Ethereum is gearing up for its next big leap.
FAQ
What is the Ethereum Fusaka upgrade?
The Fusaka upgrade is Ethereum’s next major hard fork, introducing EIPs like PeerDAS to enhance scalability and security, with a mainnet launch planned for Dec. 3 following a successful testnet on Hoodi.
How does Fusaka improve Ethereum’s scalability?
It boosts scalability through features like increased gas limits, parallel execution, and efficient data sampling, addressing the blockchain trilemma by allowing faster transactions without sacrificing decentralization or security.
What are the key EIPs in the Fusaka fork?
Key EIPs include 7594 for PeerDAS, 7825 and 7935 for gas limit increases and efficiency, plus others optimizing zero-knowledge rollups for better performance.
How has Ether’s price been affected by recent developments?
Ether hit all-time highs this year due to ETF inflows and corporate adoption, with Fusaka expected to further support growth by improving network efficiency.
What’s next after the Fusaka upgrade?
Attention will shift to the Glamsterdam upgrade as part of Ethereum’s Surge roadmap, focusing on even greater scalability enhancements.
You may also like

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…

Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.

Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?

AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway

What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.