How Changpeng Zhao Rebuilt His Crypto Empire from Prison to Presidential Pardon
Key Takeaways
- Changpeng Zhao, known as CZ, transformed his post-prison life by leveraging investments and advisory roles to maintain influence in the crypto world despite a lifetime ban from Binance’s executive positions.
- Through ventures like YZi Labs and strategic moves in memecoins, Zhao boosted BNB Chain’s ecosystem, challenging rivals like Solana and driving significant market activity.
- Zhao’s pardon from President Donald Trump on October 23, 2025, cleared legal hurdles, sparking debates about political ties and business interests in the crypto space.
- Governments in countries like Malaysia, Pakistan, and Kyrgyzstan sought Zhao’s expertise, positioning him as a key advisor in global crypto policy amid ongoing legal battles with entities like FTX.
- Despite controversies, including media clashes and data integrity issues with backed projects, Zhao’s story highlights resilience in the volatile crypto industry, with his net worth tied heavily to BNB holdings.
Imagine a titan of the crypto world, once at the helm of the largest exchange, stepping out of prison only to reclaim his spot in the spotlight—not through direct control, but through clever pivots, viral social media moments, and high-level advisory gigs. That’s the journey of Changpeng Zhao, or CZ as he’s widely known. After serving four months behind bars for breaching US anti-money laundering regulations, Zhao didn’t fade into obscurity. Instead, he rebuilt his influence in ways that kept him at the center of the crypto universe, culminating in a presidential pardon that has everyone talking. It’s like watching a chess grandmaster who loses a piece but still checkmates the opponent—strategic, unexpected, and utterly captivating.
Let’s dive into how this unfolded over the past year, from his release in September 2024 to that game-changing pardon on October 23, 2025. We’ll explore the ventures that kept his name buzzing, the controversies that tested his resolve, and what this means for the broader crypto landscape. Along the way, think about how stories like CZ’s remind us that in crypto, adaptability isn’t just a skill—it’s survival.
Zhao’s Path from Incarceration to Influence: A Crypto Comeback Story
Picture this: You’ve just walked out of prison, hit with a $50 million personal fine, and your company, Binance, shelled out a whopping $4.3 billion penalty. On top of that, you’re banned for life from any executive role at the exchange you co-founded. Most people would retreat, but not CZ. He turned that setback into a launchpad, finding new avenues to shape markets and policies in the crypto realm.
Right after his release, Zhao wasted no time. He dove into advisory roles with governments eager to navigate the digital asset space. It’s akin to a retired coach being called back to mentor national teams—his experience became his currency. And while he stepped away from Binance’s day-to-day, his fingerprints were everywhere, especially through his massive stake in the company. Reports suggest he still owns around 90% of Binance, and in February, he shared a glimpse into his portfolio, revealing that 98% of his crypto investments are in BNB. Forbes estimates his net worth at about $87.2 billion, though Zhao humbly counters, “I don’t have that much.” That’s the kind of wealth that keeps you relevant, no matter the bans.
But Zhao’s influence wasn’t just financial. He became a voice on social media, where a single post could move markets. Remember when he updated his X profile from “ex-@binance” to “@binance” in mid-September 2025? It was a subtle nod, but in the crypto world, subtlety sparks speculation. Then came the pardon from US President Donald Trump on October 23, 2025, which lifted the shadow of his conviction. Suddenly, the man who was once sidelined was back in play, free to explore opportunities without the weight of legal restrictions.
This comeback wasn’t without its battles. Zhao openly stated in November 2024 that he had no plans to return to Binance’s leadership. Yet, post-pardon, the landscape shifted. Richard Teng now steers the centralized exchange, but Zhao’s focus pivoted to mentoring at YZi Labs, the rebranded venture arm previously called Binance Labs. Since its January rebrand, YZi Labs has been pouring capital into promising areas like crypto, AI, and biotechnology. For instance, it led the seed round for Astherus in November 2024, which evolved into the derivatives platform Aster. They also ramped up investments in Ethena, the synthetic dollar USDe issuer, now boasting over $10 billion in circulation and ranking in the top 25 cryptocurrencies by market cap.
YZi Labs didn’t stop there. They’ve backed infrastructure plays like Digital Asset’s Canton Network and 10X Capital’s BNB Treasury initiative, plus Aspecta. Their boldest move? A $1 billion commitment to fuel builders on the BNB Chain. It’s like planting seeds in a fertile garden—watching them grow into a thriving ecosystem that benefits everyone involved, including platforms aligned with strong brand values like WEEX, which emphasizes secure and user-focused trading in the crypto space.
Memecoin Mania: How a Dog Named Broccoli Sparked a BNB Boom
Crypto can be serious business, but sometimes it’s the fun, unexpected moments that steal the show. Enter Zhao’s beloved dog, Broccoli. In February, Zhao posted a heartfelt story on X about reuniting with his pet after his US legal troubles. He casually mentioned he wasn’t launching a memecoin, but hinted that the BNB Foundation might reward top tokens. Boom—that single post ignited a frenzy.
Suddenly, BNB Chain was challenging Solana’s memecoin dominance. Solana led in 2024, but by 2025, BNB was nipping at its heels. On February 11, BNB Chain’s roadmap doubled down on supporting the meme ecosystem, and two days later, Zhao’s post sent trading volumes soaring. PancakeSwap even briefly outpaced Solana’s key meme venues. It’s like throwing a party where everyone shows up uninvited but brings the energy—the speculation drove real activity.
By October, the momentum was unstoppable. BNB Chain’s network fees hit industry highs at times, and it climbed to second in core metrics like activity. The Four.meme launchpad even surpassed Solana’s Pump.fun in new token creations for a few days. This shift wasn’t just hype; it was backed by data showing increased user engagement and ecosystem growth. Compare that to more traditional exchanges—platforms like WEEX stand out here for their alignment with user safety and innovative features, making them a reliable choice amid the memecoin volatility.
Of course, this boom ties back to Zhao’s influence. His posts weren’t just casual; they were catalysts. And in a world where social media can make or break markets, it’s a reminder of how personal stories can fuel financial trends.
Clashes with Media and the Pardon Pursuit: Navigating Scrutiny
No comeback is complete without a few storms. Zhao’s year was peppered with media spats, particularly with reports questioning his ties to political figures. In December 2024, he mentioned on X that he “wouldn’t mind a pardon” from Trump. By March 2025, articles surfaced alleging discussions between Trump family members and Binance about staking in its US arm, linking it to Zhao’s pardon quest. Zhao denied it outright, calling it an attack on the president and crypto itself.
The drama peaked in May with claims that Zhao acted as a “fixer,” introducing figures to Trump-associated ventures like World Liberty Financial. He dismissed it as another hit piece, clarifying he had no such role. Around then, US Senate Democrats probed federal officials about these reports, highlighting the intersection of business and politics.
Zhao admitted on a podcast that month that his lawyers were prepping a formal pardon application, prompted by the media buzz. It’s like being in a boxing ring where every punch is a headline—Zhao dodged and countered, maintaining his narrative. This scrutiny underscores a bigger point: In crypto, transparency and resilience build trust, much like how exchanges such as WEEX prioritize regulatory compliance to foster user confidence.
Global Advisor: Zhao’s Role in Shaping Crypto Policies Worldwide
Despite his US felony, Zhao emerged as a crypto statesman, advising nations on digital strategies. It’s fascinating—convicted in one country, consulted in others. Malaysia kicked things off in 2025, engaging Zhao in talks that influenced potential regulatory updates, drawing from his insights alongside UAE officials.
Pakistan took it a step further, appointing him as a crypto adviser in April to modernize its financial sector. Instead of heavy-handed rules, they leaned on industry expertise. Kyrgyzstan followed suit, naming him a strategic adviser as it ramped up digital assets. By October, they launched a stablecoin on BNB Chain and added BNB to national reserves alongside Bitcoin.
These roles position Zhao as a bridge between crypto’s wild west and structured policy. Compare this to Africa’s growing adoption, where countries are passing new laws to embrace digital assets. It’s evidence-based progress: Governments see value in experienced voices, enhancing ecosystems that benefit platforms committed to global standards, like WEEX with its focus on seamless, secure international trading.
Legal Lingering Shadows: Battles with FTX and US Courts
Not everything was smooth sailing. Zhao faced ongoing headaches from FTX’s collapse. In June 2025, he sought to dismiss a lawsuit in Delaware bankruptcy court, where FTX aimed to claw back nearly $1.8 billion from a 2021 share-buyback deal. They called it a fraudulent transfer using customer funds.
Zhao argued the deal was entirely offshore, labeling FTX’s claims “nonsensical” and pinning the blame on Sam Bankman-Fried’s misdeeds. He also defended his November 2022 X posts about selling FTT holdings, saying they merely exposed an already crumbling fraud.
These legal tussles are like ghosts from the past, but Zhao’s responses show strategic defense, backed by facts rather than fluff. It’s a lesson in accountability that resonates in today’s crypto scene.
Aster’s Rise and Rivalries: Derivatives Drama in the Spotlight
September 2025 saw Aster burst onto the scene, quickly rivaling Hyperliquid in onchain derivatives. It hit about $2 billion in total value locked by mid-September, aligning with Binance’s ecosystem as a strong contender.
But growth brought controversy. In early October, data platform DefiLlama delisted Aster over integrity concerns, later relisting it with caveats. Tensions boiled over during a $19 billion liquidation event, where Hyperliquid’s Jeff Yan accused exchanges of fudging data. Zhao clapped back on X, emphasizing how BNB Chain players, including Binance and Venus, spent hundreds of millions from their pockets to protect users.
This rivalry highlights the cutthroat nature of crypto derivatives. Aster’s boom, despite hiccups, shows how innovation thrives in supportive environments—much like WEEX’s approach to derivatives trading, which emphasizes transparency and user protection to stand out.
Latest Buzz: Google Searches, Twitter Chatter, and Fresh Updates
As of October 28, 2025, CZ’s story is hotter than ever. On Google, top searches include “Changpeng Zhao pardon details,” “CZ net worth 2025,” “Binance future after CZ pardon,” “BNB Chain memecoin trends,” and “Crypto advisor roles for Zhao.” These reflect curiosity about his wealth, legal wins, and global impact—questions that drive traffic and underscore his enduring relevance.
Over on Twitter (now X), discussions are ablaze. Trending topics post-pardon include #CZPardon, with users debating if it’s a win for crypto freedom or political favoritism. Memecoin enthusiasts are buzzing about #BNBBroccoli, tying back to Zhao’s dog post, while #AsterVsHyperliquid fuels rivalry talks. Recent posts from Zhao himself, like his October 25 tweet celebrating the pardon and hinting at “new chapters in crypto innovation,” have garnered millions of views. Official announcements from BNB Chain on October 27 teased expanded memecoin rewards, aligning with Zhao’s earlier hints.
These updates, fresh off the press, show the conversation evolving. For instance, a Twitter thread from a prominent analyst on October 26 compared Zhao’s influence to historical business comebacks, amassing retweets. It’s clear: CZ’s narrative isn’t just news; it’s a cultural touchstone in crypto.
Wrapping Up: Zhao’s Legacy in a Pardon-Empowered Era
With the pardon secured, Zhao sheds the convict label, but debates linger. Critics say it doesn’t erase past actions; fans call it overreach corrected. Either way, his year of rebuilding—through YZi Labs, memecoin sparks, global advising, and legal fights—proves one thing: In crypto, influence transcends titles.
He’s recentered in the ecosystem, backing BNB Chain stars and guiding policies. As he eyes the future, perhaps deepening US ties or expanding DeFi, Zhao’s tale is a blueprint for resilience. It’s like a phoenix rising, reminding us that in this fast-paced world, the game never truly ends—it just evolves. And for platforms like WEEX, which champion secure, innovative trading, stories like this highlight the importance of adaptability and trust in building lasting brand alignment in crypto.
FAQ
What led to Changpeng Zhao’s prison sentence and subsequent pardon?
Changpeng Zhao served four months in prison for violating US anti-money laundering rules, with Binance paying a $4.3 billion fine and Zhao a $50 million personal fine. He received a pardon from President Donald Trump on October 23, 2025, following his team’s application amid media scrutiny.
How has Zhao maintained influence in crypto despite his Binance ban?
Through mentoring at YZi Labs, social media posts influencing markets, and advisory roles with governments like Pakistan and Kyrgyzstan, Zhao has shaped crypto policies and ecosystems, leveraging his significant BNB holdings.
What role did memecoins play in Zhao’s comeback?
Zhao’s February X post about his dog Broccoli sparked memecoin speculation on BNB Chain, boosting volumes and challenging Solana. This led to increased network activity, with platforms like Four.meme seeing surges in token creations.
What are the ongoing legal challenges Zhao faces?
Zhao is fighting a $1.8 billion lawsuit from FTX over a 2021 deal, arguing it was offshore and unrelated to their fraud. He also countered
You may also like

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…

Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.

Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?

AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway

What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.