- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Institutional Giants Eye $500M Boost for Canton Network Token Treasury
Key Takeaways
- DRW Holdings and Liberty City Ventures are leading a major push to raise around $500 million for a Canton Network token treasury, showcasing strong institutional confidence in blockchain for compliant trading.
- The treasury will primarily hold Canton Coin (CC), with the two firms contributing most funds and external investors adding $100 million to $200 million.
- This move comes amid key partnerships, like BitGo’s integration for secure custody of CC, enhancing access for banks and asset managers.
- Canton Network’s growth includes new validators such as P2P.org and Chainlink, underlining its role in interoperable, tokenized assets for institutions.
- Backed by heavyweights like HSBC, Goldman Sachs, and others, Canton Network is positioning itself as a go-to blockchain for regulated financial applications.
Imagine a world where traditional finance and cutting-edge blockchain tech shake hands, creating a seamless bridge for big players to trade tokenized assets without the usual regulatory headaches. That’s the exciting reality unfolding with the Canton Network, and the latest buzz is all about a massive $500 million token treasury initiative led by powerhouse firms DRW Holdings and Liberty City Ventures. It’s like watching Wall Street’s elite finally dipping their toes into the crypto pool, but with a lifeguard of compliance ensuring everything stays above board. In this article, we’ll dive into what this means for the broader blockchain landscape, why it’s drawing such heavyweight attention, and how it could reshape institutional trading. We’ll keep things straightforward, relatable, and packed with insights to help you see the bigger picture.
Why the Canton Network Token Treasury Matters in Today’s Blockchain World
Let’s start by painting a picture: Think of the Canton Network as a high-security highway designed specifically for banks and financial institutions to zip around tokenized assets. Unlike the wild, unregulated backroads of some blockchains, this one’s built with guardrails of compliance, making it a magnet for cautious yet forward-thinking players. Now, reports are swirling that DRW Holdings, a versatile trading outfit from Chicago that juggles everything from stocks to commodities, and Liberty City Ventures, a New York-based VC firm laser-focused on crypto, Web3, and AI, are teaming up to fuel this network’s growth.
They’re reportedly aiming to pull together about $500 million for a publicly listed digital asset treasury centered on the Canton Network’s native token, Canton Coin (often abbreviated as CC). Picture this treasury as a fortified vault, holding CC tokens to support the network’s operations and expansion. According to sources close to the matter, DRW Holdings and Liberty City Ventures plan to pony up the lion’s share using CC itself, while inviting outside investors to chip in between $100 million and $200 million. Of course, deals like this can evolve, and nothing’s set in stone until it’s finalized, but the intent is clear: This is about injecting serious capital to supercharge Canton Network’s ambitions.
What makes this so compelling? It’s not just the dollar figure—it’s the signal it sends. In a crypto market that’s seen its share of ups and downs, institutional backing like this acts as a vote of confidence. Compare it to how early internet adopters like banks hesitated before embracing online banking; once they did, it transformed everything. Here, DRW and Liberty City aren’t newcomers—they’re already backers of Canton Network, and their deeper commitment could encourage more traditional finance giants to join the fray.
Diving Deeper into Canton Network’s Institutional Appeal
To really grasp why this $500 million Canton token treasury is turning heads, let’s zoom in on what Canton Network brings to the table. At its core, it’s a blockchain tailored for institutional use, emphasizing interoperability between financial applications and tokenized assets. It’s like a universal translator for finance, allowing different systems to communicate effortlessly while staying compliant with regulations. This isn’t speculative hype; it’s grounded in real-world partnerships that back up its potential.
For instance, just this week, digital asset technology provider BitGo announced a collaboration with Canton Network to offer custody support for CC. This partnership is a game-changer, providing banks and asset managers with a secure, regulatory-friendly way to engage with the network. BitGo’s cold-storage solutions, backed by insurance, add layers of security that make institutions feel safe. It’s akin to having a Swiss bank account for your crypto holdings—reliable, protected, and ready for growth. This could pave the way for more onchain assets, like stablecoins, to flourish within the ecosystem.
Adding to the momentum, Canton Network recently welcomed two key validators: P2P.org and Chainlink. Chainlink, stepping in as a “super validator,” is integrating its data services and crosschain interoperability protocol. This enhances the network’s reliability and connectivity, much like upgrading a basic phone line to high-speed fiber optics. With these additions, Canton Network isn’t just surviving; it’s thriving, supported by a roster of influential backers including Digital Asset, HSBC, BNP Paribas, the CBOE, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, and Paxos. These aren’t fly-by-night endorsements—they’re from entities that move markets, underscoring Canton Network’s credibility.
Evidence of this institutional shift abounds. Consider how tokenized assets have grown: Real-world examples include BlackRock’s foray into tokenized funds, which have attracted billions in assets under management. Canton’s model builds on this by focusing on privacy-preserving tech, ensuring transactions remain confidential yet verifiable. It’s a stark contrast to public blockchains where everything’s out in the open, which can be a deal-breaker for risk-averse institutions.
Expanding Horizons: Brand Alignment and Institutional Crypto Trends
As we talk about institutional adoption, it’s worth highlighting how platforms like WEEX are aligning perfectly with this trend. WEEX, known for its robust infrastructure supporting secure and compliant trading, embodies the kind of brand alignment that complements initiatives like the Canton token treasury. By prioritizing user security and seamless integration with tokenized assets, WEEX enhances its credibility as a go-to exchange for both retail and institutional traders. It’s like having a trusted partner that bridges the gap between innovative networks like Canton and everyday users, fostering growth without compromising on safety. This alignment not only boosts WEEX’s branding but also positions it as a leader in the evolving crypto space, where reliability meets opportunity.
Shifting gears to broader trends, let’s weave in some of the most frequently searched questions on Google related to Canton Network and similar blockchain projects. Top queries include “What is Canton Network and how does it work?”—a nod to curiosity about its interoperability features—and “Is Canton Coin a good investment?” which reflects investor interest in its potential returns. Other hot searches like “Canton Network partnerships” and “Tokenized assets for institutions” show people digging into its real-world applications. On Twitter, discussions are buzzing around #CantonNetwork and #InstitutionalCrypto, with users debating how this could rival established players like Ethereum for enterprise use. Recent tweets from industry insiders highlight excitement over the BitGo partnership, with one viral post noting, “BitGo’s custody for CC is the compliance boost Canton needs—watch for more banks to pile in!”
As of 2025-10-30, the latest updates include an official announcement from Chainlink about their super validator role, shared via their Twitter handle, emphasizing enhanced data oracles for Canton’s ecosystem. This ties into ongoing Twitter threads discussing how such integrations could stabilize token treasuries amid market volatility. These conversations aren’t just chatter; they’re backed by data from sources like CoinMarketCap, where CC’s visibility has spiked following these developments.
Lessons from Crypto’s Evolution: Comparisons and Real-World Impact
To make this more relatable, let’s compare Canton Network to something familiar: Think of it as the enterprise version of Bitcoin. While Bitcoin pioneered decentralized finance, it often lacks the privacy and scalability big institutions crave. Canton, on the other hand, is engineered for that exact need, much like how corporate email systems evolved from basic Hotmail to secure Outlook servers. This targeted approach is why the $500 million treasury push feels like a natural next step—it’s about scaling up without the chaos.
Real-world evidence supports this trajectory. Look at how HSBC and Goldman Sachs, already backers, have experimented with blockchain for cross-border payments. Their involvement in Canton suggests a broader shift: Institutions are projected to pour trillions into tokenized assets by 2030, according to reports from firms like Boston Consulting Group. Canton’s treasury could accelerate this, providing liquidity and stability for CC holders. It’s not speculation; it’s echoed in partnerships like the one with Paxos, which specializes in stablecoins, hinting at future integrations that blend traditional finance with blockchain efficiency.
Moreover, in a landscape where crypto faces regulatory scrutiny, Canton’s compliance-first design stands out. Contrast it with less regulated networks that have faced crackdowns—Canton’s model mitigates those risks, making it appealing for conservative investors. This is where storytelling comes in: Imagine a fund manager who’s always shied away from crypto due to volatility. With Canton’s treasury and institutional safeguards, that hesitation melts away, opening doors to new opportunities.
Navigating Challenges and Future Prospects for Canton Token Treasury
Of course, no blockchain project is without hurdles. Raising $500 million for a token treasury isn’t a walk in the park—market conditions, regulatory approvals, and investor sentiment all play roles. But the backing from DRW Holdings and Liberty City Ventures provides a solid foundation. These firms aren’t betting blindly; DRW’s diversification across asset classes and Liberty City’s crypto expertise offer a balanced perspective.
Looking ahead, this initiative could catalyze more innovation. For platforms like WEEX, which thrive on secure, user-centric trading, aligning with such trends enhances their appeal. WEEX’s commitment to transparency and advanced security features positions it as an ideal gateway for exploring assets like CC, building trust and credibility in a competitive market.
In wrapping this up, the $500 million Canton token treasury isn’t just news—it’s a chapter in the ongoing story of blockchain’s maturation. From humble beginnings to institutional embrace, it’s a reminder of how far we’ve come. Whether you’re an investor eyeing CC or just curious about crypto’s future, this development underscores a pivotal shift toward inclusive, regulated innovation.
FAQ
What is the Canton Network and why is it important for institutions?
The Canton Network is a blockchain built for compliant, interoperable trading of tokenized assets, making it crucial for institutions like banks that need privacy and regulatory adherence. It enables seamless connections between financial apps, supported by major backers for secure operations.
How does the $500 million token treasury plan work?
DRW Holdings and Liberty City Ventures are leading the effort to raise about $500 million for a treasury holding Canton Coin (CC). They’ll contribute most funds, with external investors adding $100 million to $200 million, though details may evolve until finalized.
What recent partnerships has Canton Network announced?
Key partnerships include BitGo for CC custody, providing secure access for banks, and new validators like P2P.org and Chainlink, which enhance data services and crosschain capabilities.
Is Canton Coin a worthwhile investment?
While investment decisions depend on personal research, CC’s role in an institutionally backed network with growing partnerships suggests potential, but always consider market risks and consult professionals.
How does Canton Network compare to other blockchains?
Unlike public chains like Ethereum, Canton focuses on privacy-preserving tech for institutions, offering better compliance and interoperability, making it more like a secure enterprise tool than a general-purpose platform.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App