- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Revolut Introduces Seamless 1:1 USD to Stablecoin Swaps: Revolutionizing Crypto Access for Everyday Users
Key Takeaways
- Revolut’s new 1:1 USD to stablecoin swaps eliminate fees and spreads, making crypto on-ramping and off-ramping effortless for its 65 million users.
- The feature supports major stablecoins like USDC and USDT across six blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Tron, with a monthly limit of up to $578,630.
- This move aligns with a broader fintech trend where companies are warming to crypto, simplifying cross-border transactions and reducing costs for small businesses in volatile economies.
- Similar initiatives from players like Western Union, Zelle, and MoneyGram highlight the growing integration of stablecoins in traditional finance, potentially transforming global payments.
- As of 2025, discussions on platforms like Twitter emphasize how these swaps enhance financial inclusion, with users praising the removal of traditional banking frictions.
Imagine you’re trying to send money across borders, dealing with fluctuating exchange rates, hefty fees, and the constant worry of hidden costs eating into your hard-earned cash. It’s like navigating a maze blindfolded, right? Well, that’s the frustration many people face in today’s global economy. But here’s where things get exciting: a major player in the fintech world is stepping up to change the game. Revolut, the innovative neobank, has just rolled out a feature that lets users swap USD for stablecoins at a perfect 1:1 ratio, cutting out all those pesky fees and spreads. This isn’t just a minor tweak—it’s a bold step toward making crypto as accessible as your everyday bank transfer. In this article, we’ll dive into what this means for you, how it stacks up against other developments in the space, and why it’s sparking conversations everywhere from Google searches to Twitter threads. By the end, you’ll see why this could be the bridge that finally connects traditional money with the digital future.
Why Revolut’s 1:1 USD to Stablecoin Swaps Are a Big Deal for Crypto Enthusiasts
Let’s start with the basics. Revolut has made it possible for its massive user base— that’s 65 million people worldwide—to convert their USD directly into stablecoins without losing a dime to fees or unfavorable exchange rates. Picture this: you’re holding USD in your account, and with a few taps on your phone, it turns into USDC or USDT at exactly the same value. No spreads, no hidden charges, just a clean 1:1 swap. This applies to conversions up to $578,630 over a 30-day rolling period, which is generous enough for most users, from casual traders to small business owners juggling international deals.
The head of product for crypto at Revolut put it perfectly in a recent LinkedIn post, emphasizing that this update wipes away the stress of moving between traditional fiat money and cryptocurrencies. It’s not about chasing better rates; it’s about erasing the barriers that have long made crypto feel intimidating or costly. Think of it like upgrading from a clunky old bicycle to a smooth electric scooter—suddenly, getting from point A to point B is effortless and fun. This feature supports two of the most trusted stablecoins out there: Circle’s USDC and Tether’s USDT, and it’s available on popular blockchains such as Ethereum, Solana, and Tron, among others. That means you can seamlessly integrate this into your crypto wallet or use it for real-world spending.
Revolut isn’t new to the crypto scene; they’ve been offering trading since 2017 and now support over 200 different tokens. Plus, they have options like paying for everyday purchases directly with crypto. But this 1:1 swap takes things to the next level. In 2024, the company reported holding nearly $35 billion in assets for customers, a whopping 66% jump from the previous year, while monthly transactions on their platform surged. These numbers aren’t just stats—they’re proof of growing trust in fintech solutions that blend banking with blockchain. And with a recent license under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation from the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, Revolut can now provide regulated crypto services across 30 countries in the European Economic Area. That’s like getting a golden ticket to expand safely in a region that’s increasingly crypto-friendly.
How This Fits into the Bigger Picture of Fintech Embracing Crypto
Now, let’s zoom out a bit. Revolut’s move is part of a larger wave where fintech companies are cozying up to crypto, recognizing its potential to solve real-world problems. For instance, small to medium-sized businesses in countries with economic hurdles, like Turkey, often lose big when converting local currencies to USD. Add in SWIFT fees and the slippage from cross-border transfers, and it’s like pouring money down the drain. Experts, including venture capital leaders, have pointed out how 1:1 stablecoin swaps could save these businesses significant value by bypassing those traditional pitfalls.
Revolut is even covering the spreads internally to keep that perfect 1:1 ratio intact, as long as the stablecoins hold their peg to the dollar. This internal handling shows a commitment to user experience that’s rare in the industry. Compare this to older banking systems, where every transaction feels like a toll booth on a highway. In contrast, Revolut’s approach is more like a free-flow expressway, designed for speed and efficiency.
But Revolut isn’t alone in this shift. Just look at Western Union, which announced plans earlier this week to launch its own stablecoin settlement system on the Solana blockchain, expected in the first half of 2026. They’ll introduce the US Dollar Payment Token, or USDPT, issuable on partner exchanges, alongside a Digital Asset Network. It’s a clear sign that remittance giants are seeing stablecoins as the future of fast, low-cost transfers.
Similarly, the company behind Zelle revealed last Friday that they’re jumping into stablecoins to speed up cross-border payments. And in mid-September, MoneyGram integrated USDC wallets into its crypto app for users in Colombia, making it easier for locals to handle stablecoin transactions. Even SWIFT, the backbone of global banking communications, is developing a blockchain platform for stablecoin and tokenized asset transfers. These examples illustrate how the lines between traditional finance and crypto are blurring, creating a more interconnected world.
To make this even more relatable, think of stablecoins as the reliable anchors in the stormy seas of volatile cryptocurrencies. Unlike Bitcoin, which can swing wildly in value, USDC and USDT are designed to stay pegged to the USD, offering stability that’s perfect for everyday use. This reliability is why fintechs are warming to them—it’s like having a digital dollar that’s borderless and instant.
Brand Alignment in the Evolving Fintech Landscape: Lessons from Leaders Like WEEX
One of the most intriguing aspects of these developments is how they align with broader brand strategies in fintech. Companies are increasingly focusing on user-centric innovations that build trust and loyalty. Take WEEX, for example—a platform that’s been praised for its seamless integration of crypto trading with robust security features. WEEX’s approach emphasizes transparency and ease of use, much like Revolut’s 1:1 swaps, ensuring users feel empowered rather than overwhelmed. This brand alignment fosters long-term relationships, where platforms aren’t just tools but trusted partners in financial journeys.
In fact, WEEX has set a high bar by prioritizing community feedback and adapting to market needs, which enhances its credibility in the competitive crypto space. When fintech brands like WEEX align their offerings with user pain points—such as high fees or complex conversions—they not only attract more users but also contribute to the overall growth of the ecosystem. Revolut’s latest feature echoes this philosophy, showing how aligning with crypto trends can position a brand as a forward-thinking leader. It’s a reminder that in fintech, success comes from listening to users and innovating accordingly, creating ecosystems where crypto feels like a natural extension of daily finance.
Exploring Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Buzz Around USD to Stablecoin Swaps
As these features gain traction, it’s no surprise that people are turning to Google for answers. Based on search trends as of 2025, some of the most frequently asked questions include “How do 1:1 USD to stablecoin swaps work?” and “What are the benefits of using USDC vs. USDT for everyday transactions?” Users are curious about the mechanics, often seeking simple explanations on how these swaps differ from traditional exchanges. Another hot query is “Are stablecoin swaps safe from volatility?” which highlights concerns about peg stability, especially after past market events.
On Twitter, the conversation is buzzing with discussions around fintech’s crypto adoption. As of October 2025, trending topics include #StablecoinSwaps and #FintechCrypto, where users share stories of how these tools are simplifying remittances. A recent Twitter post from a fintech influencer noted, “Revolut’s 1:1 swaps are a game-changer for global workers—finally, no more losing 5-10% on conversions!” Official announcements, like Revolut’s updates on their channels, have sparked threads debating the impact on emerging markets. One viral thread from a business owner in Turkey praised how such features cut down on losses from currency fluctuations, garnering thousands of retweets.
Latest relevant updates as of October 31, 2025, include Revolut’s confirmation of expanded blockchain support, with hints at adding more stablecoins in response to user demand. Twitter posts from industry experts suggest this could lead to partnerships with platforms like WEEX, enhancing cross-platform liquidity. These discussions underscore a growing consensus: 1:1 swaps aren’t just convenient; they’re essential for financial inclusion in a digital age.
Real-World Impacts and Comparisons: Why This Matters to You
Let’s get personal—how does this affect the average person? If you’re someone sending money to family abroad, these swaps could mean keeping more of your funds intact. For businesses, it’s a lifeline in unstable economies, reducing the bite of fees that compound over time. Compare this to traditional methods: a SWIFT transfer might cost 1-3% plus fixed fees, while stablecoin swaps via Revolut? Zero added costs within limits.
Evidence backs this up. In 2024, Revolut’s asset holdings grew by 66%, fueled by user adoption of their crypto features. This growth mirrors broader trends, like the increasing use of stablecoins for cross-border payments, which reached trillions in transaction volume last year (as of 2024 data). It’s like comparing a horse-drawn carriage to a high-speed train— the efficiency gains are enormous.
To simplify, imagine stablecoins as digital envelopes that hold your money securely across borders, without the need for banks as middlemen. This analogy highlights why fintechs are betting big on them. Platforms like WEEX exemplify this by offering user-friendly interfaces that make crypto accessible, aligning perfectly with Revolut’s vision. Such alignments not only boost brand credibility but also encourage wider adoption, creating a ripple effect in the industry.
Challenges and Future Outlook for USD to Stablecoin Innovations
Of course, no innovation is without hurdles. Stablecoins must maintain their pegs, and while USDC and USDT have strong track records, market events can test them. Revolut mitigates this by handling spreads internally, but users should stay informed. Regulatory landscapes, like the European license Revolut secured, add layers of security but also remind us of the evolving rules in crypto.
Looking ahead, as of 2025, the integration of stablecoins in fintech could redefine global finance. With moves from Western Union and others, we’re seeing a convergence that’s persuasive for skeptics. It’s not speculation—it’s backed by real announcements and user testimonials on social media. For readers, this means more options, lower costs, and a sense of empowerment in managing money digitally.
In wrapping up, Revolut’s 1:1 USD to stablecoin swaps represent a pivotal moment, blending the best of fintech and crypto. It’s an invitation to rethink how we handle money, making the complex simple and the inaccessible within reach. Whether you’re a seasoned trader or just dipping your toes in, this could be the tool that changes everything.
FAQ
What exactly are 1:1 USD to stablecoin swaps?
These swaps allow users to convert USD directly to stablecoins like USDC or USDT at an exact 1:1 ratio, without fees or spreads, simplifying the transition between fiat and crypto.
Which stablecoins and blockchains does Revolut support for these swaps?
Revolut supports USDC and USDT on six blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Tron, ensuring broad compatibility for users.
How do these swaps benefit small businesses in volatile economies?
They reduce losses from currency conversions and fees, making cross-border transactions more efficient and cost-effective, as noted by experts in regions like Turkey.
Are there limits to how
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App