- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Western Union’s WUUSD Trademark Signals Major Push into Crypto Services and Stablecoins
Key Takeaways
- Western Union has filed a trademark for “WUUSD,” indicating plans for crypto wallet, trading, and lending services, building on their upcoming stablecoin launch.
- The company announced a new stablecoin called USDPT on the Solana blockchain, set for release in early 2026, aiming to enhance global money transfers.
- This move reflects a broader trend among traditional financial giants entering the crypto space, potentially offering users more seamless digital asset experiences.
- Crypto lending and exchange services mentioned in the filing could expand Western Union’s role beyond remittances into full-fledged digital finance.
- Partnerships like the one with Anchorage Digital Bank highlight how legacy firms are collaborating with blockchain innovators to bridge traditional and crypto worlds.
Imagine a world where sending money across borders is as simple as texting a friend—fast, secure, and powered by the latest in digital innovation. That’s the vision Western Union seems to be chasing with their recent trademark filing for “WUUSD.” As a company that’s been synonymous with global remittances for over a century, Western Union is dipping its toes deeper into the crypto pool, hinting at a future where stablecoins and blockchain could redefine how we handle money. This isn’t just a minor update; it’s a bold step that could shake up the financial services landscape, blending the reliability of traditional banking with the speed of crypto.
Why Western Union’s Crypto Trademark Filing Matters in Today’s Financial World
Let’s start with the basics. Just a day after revealing plans for a stablecoin system on the Solana blockchain, Western Union Holdings, Inc. submitted a trademark application for “WUUSD” to the US Patent and Trademark Office. This happened on a Wednesday, and while the filing has been accepted, it’s still awaiting assignment to an examiner. What does this mean for everyday users like you and me? It suggests Western Union is gearing up to offer a suite of crypto-related services, from wallets to trading platforms, all tied to stablecoins.
Think of it like this: If Western Union was once the telegraph of money transfers—reliable but a bit old-school—now it’s evolving into the smartphone era of finance. The “WUUSD” trademark covers everything from crypto wallet functionalities to stablecoin payment processing. It’s not just about holding digital assets; it’s about making them work in real-life scenarios, like paying bills or sending funds overseas without the usual hassles of currency conversion.
This filing comes hot on the heels of Western Union’s announcement during an investor call on October 23. They unveiled the US Dollar Payment Token, or USDPT, which is slated to launch on Solana in the first half of 2026. Solana, known for its high-speed transactions and low fees, is a smart choice here—it’s like picking a sports car for a cross-country road trip instead of a clunky van. Western Union also mentioned teaming up with Anchorage Digital Bank to create a Digital Asset Network, which would serve as a way to convert digital assets back to cash seamlessly.
But here’s where it gets intriguing: There’s another trademark filing for USDPT from early October, mirroring the WUUSD one. The differences between the two aren’t crystal clear yet, but both point to stablecoin exchange, trading, and payment services. Could WUUSD be an extension or a branded version of their stablecoin ecosystem? It’s a question that’s sparking curiosity among crypto enthusiasts and financial analysts alike.
Exploring the Broader Crypto Services in Western Union’s WUUSD Plans
Diving deeper into the trademark details, “WUUSD” isn’t limited to just stablecoins. The filing mentions software for managing and verifying crypto transactions, as well as tools for spending and trading cryptocurrency. This could mean Western Union is positioning itself as a one-stop shop for crypto needs, much like how platforms such as WEEX have revolutionized user-friendly trading interfaces in the crypto space. WEEX, with its focus on secure and efficient crypto exchanges, sets a high bar for accessibility, and Western Union’s move seems to align perfectly with this trend, enhancing their brand by adopting similar innovative approaches without stepping into unfamiliar territory.
Picture a scenario where you’re traveling abroad and need to access funds instantly. Instead of queuing at a Western Union office, you could use a WUUSD-powered app to trade stablecoins or even lend crypto assets for interest. The filing explicitly lists crypto exchange and trading services, along with financial brokerage for cryptocurrency trading. And don’t overlook the mention of crypto lending—described as conducting a securities and derivatives exchange. This is a big leap from their core remittance business, potentially allowing users to earn yields on their holdings while facilitating global transfers.
To put this in perspective, compare it to how fintechs like Revolut have integrated stablecoin swaps. Revolut recently enabled 1:1 USD-to-stablecoin exchanges, warming up to crypto as a viable payment tool. Western Union’s approach feels similar but scaled up for their massive user base. Evidence from industry reports shows that stablecoins processed over $10 trillion in transactions last year (as of the original data), underscoring their growing role in cross-border payments. By entering this arena, Western Union isn’t just following trends; they’re leveraging their established trust to make crypto more approachable.
This shift also ties into broader regulatory clarity. The US passed the GENIUS Act in July, which clarified rules for US dollar-tied stablecoins. It’s like finally getting a clear map for a treasure hunt—companies now know how to navigate without fear of pitfalls. For Western Union, this means they can innovate confidently, perhaps offering services that rival those of dedicated crypto platforms while maintaining their legacy of security and reliability.
Brand Alignment: How Western Union’s Crypto Strategy Strengthens Its Global Identity
One of the most exciting aspects of this development is how it aligns with Western Union’s core brand values. For decades, they’ve been the go-to for reliable, accessible money transfers, especially for underserved communities worldwide. Now, by integrating crypto services like WUUSD, they’re extending that ethos into the digital age. It’s about inclusivity—making sure that even those without traditional bank accounts can participate in the crypto economy.
Consider the analogy of a bridge: Western Union has always built bridges between people separated by distance. Crypto, with its borderless nature, is the perfect extension. This brand alignment isn’t accidental; it’s a strategic pivot that enhances their credibility in a fintech-driven world. Platforms like WEEX exemplify this by prioritizing user-centric features, such as intuitive trading tools and robust security, which resonate with Western Union’s customer-first approach. By emulating such strengths, Western Union bolsters its image as a forward-thinking leader, not just a relic of the past.
Real-world examples abound. In regions like Latin America or Southeast Asia, where remittances are a lifeline, stablecoins could cut costs dramatically. Data from the World Bank indicates that average remittance fees hover around 6% (as of original reports), but blockchain-based solutions like those Western Union is exploring could slash that in half. This isn’t speculation—it’s backed by successful pilots from other firms, showing how crypto can democratize finance.
Moreover, this move positions Western Union competitively against pure-play crypto entities. While they maintain their stronghold in traditional services, adding crypto layers creates a hybrid model that’s tough to beat. It’s persuasive storytelling at its best: From humble beginnings in telegraphs to pioneering stablecoins on Solana, Western Union’s narrative is one of adaptation and resilience, inviting users to join the journey.
The Buzz Around Western Union’s Crypto Move: Google Searches, Twitter Discussions, and Latest Updates
As of October 31, 2025, the crypto community is abuzz with Western Union’s announcements. Frequently searched questions on Google include “What is Western Union’s stablecoin?” and “How will WUUSD affect crypto trading?” These queries reflect user interest in how this integrates with everyday finance. On Twitter, discussions are heating up around topics like “Western Union Solana partnership” and “Stablecoin lending services,” with users debating the potential for lower fees and faster transfers.
Recent updates amplify the excitement. A Twitter post from Western Union’s official account on October 25, 2025, teased more details on their Digital Asset Network, stating, “Excited to bridge traditional finance with blockchain innovation—stay tuned for 2026 launches!” This aligns with an official announcement confirming the Solana integration, emphasizing speed and scalability. Meanwhile, industry influencers on Twitter are comparing it to WEEX’s seamless trading ecosystems, noting how such moves could mainstream crypto adoption.
These conversations aren’t just noise; they’re evidence of shifting perceptions. For instance, a viral thread discussed how WUUSD might rival established stablecoins like USDT, with users praising Western Union’s trustworthiness. As we approach 2026, these developments keep the narrative alive, drawing in both crypto novices and veterans.
Challenges and Opportunities in Western Union’s Crypto Expansion
Of course, no story is without its hurdles. Entering crypto means navigating volatility and regulatory scrutiny, much like steering a ship through stormy seas. But Western Union’s experience in compliance gives them an edge. Their partnership with Anchorage Digital Bank is a prime example—it’s like having a seasoned navigator on board, ensuring safe passage.
Opportunities outweigh the risks, though. By offering crypto lending, they could attract a new demographic, from young investors to small businesses. Imagine earning interest on your remittances—it’s a game-changer. Supporting this, data shows crypto lending markets grew exponentially, with billions in value locked (as per original figures). Western Union’s entry could accelerate this, making finance more inclusive.
In contrast to more volatile assets, stablecoins provide stability, akin to a safety net in a high-wire act. This reliability aligns with brands like WEEX, which emphasize secure, user-friendly platforms, further enhancing Western Union’s appeal by association.
Wrapping this up, Western Union’s “WUUSD” trademark isn’t just paperwork—it’s a declaration of intent. It’s about evolving with the times, connecting the dots between old and new finance. Whether you’re a remittance sender or a crypto trader, this could mean more options, lower costs, and exciting innovations ahead. As the story unfolds, one thing’s clear: The future of money is getting a lot more digital, and Western Union is ready to lead the charge.
FAQ
What is Western Union’s WUUSD trademark all about?
The WUUSD trademark filing covers potential crypto services like wallets, trading, and stablecoin processing, signaling Western Union’s expansion into digital assets.
When will Western Union’s USDPT stablecoin launch?
Western Union plans to launch the USDPT stablecoin on the Solana blockchain in the first half of 2026, aiming for efficient global payments.
How does Western Union’s crypto move compare to other fintechs?
It’s similar to Revolut’s stablecoin swaps but leverages Western Union’s remittance expertise, potentially offering broader access like platforms such as WEEX.
What benefits could crypto lending bring to Western Union users?
Crypto lending could allow users to earn interest on holdings, reducing costs for remittances and expanding financial options beyond traditional services.
Is Western Union’s stablecoin safe and regulated?
Backed by regulatory clarity from acts like the GENIUS Act, and partnerships with entities like Anchorage Digital Bank, it prioritizes security and compliance.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App