Why Banks’ Fears About Stablecoins Miss the Mark: Insights from Coinbase and Beyond
Key Takeaways
- Banks’ worries about stablecoins causing a massive exodus from traditional deposits overlook the global, non-US-centric demand for these digital assets.
- Stablecoins primarily serve international users for dollar exposure and hedging, not competing directly with US bank accounts.
- Claims that stablecoins will devastate community banks ignore the minimal overlap between stablecoin users and typical bank customers.
- Rather than a threat, stablecoins enhance the US dollar’s global dominance and offer opportunities for banks to innovate.
- Forecasts of trillions in stablecoin growth won’t significantly drain US deposits, as most value remains foreign-held or in digital ecosystems.
Imagine you’re holding a dollar bill in your hand—crisp, familiar, a symbol of stability in a chaotic world. Now, picture that same dollar digitized, zipping across borders instantly, accessible to anyone with a smartphone, even in the most remote corners of the globe. That’s the essence of stablecoins, those crypto tokens pegged to the US dollar that have banks sweating bullets. But according to researchers at Coinbase, these fears are more smoke than fire, echoing old panics about financial innovations that ultimately strengthened the system. In this deep dive, we’ll unpack why the narrative around stablecoins harming banks doesn’t hold water, explore real-world uses that banks might be missing, and look at how platforms like WEEX are aligning with this trend to boost user empowerment and global financial access. Let’s break it down step by step, shall we?
Stablecoins and Banks: Separating Hype from Reality
You’ve probably heard the buzz: US banking groups are ringing alarm bells, urging lawmakers to rein in stablecoins, especially those offering yields that could lure customers away from traditional bank accounts. It’s a compelling story on the surface—why keep your money in a low-interest savings account when a stablecoin might offer better returns? But dig a little deeper, and it becomes clear this concern ignores the bigger picture. As Coinbase’s policy experts point out, the idea that stablecoins will “destroy bank lending” is a narrative that misses how these tokens actually function in the real world.
Think of it like this: Remember when money market funds first exploded onto the scene? Banks fretted then too, worried about deposit drains. Yet, those funds didn’t obliterate banking; they complemented it, forcing innovation and better services. Stablecoins are following a similar path. They’re not poised to cannibalize US bank deposits because their demand isn’t coming from everyday American savers. Instead, they’re a lifeline for people worldwide seeking a piece of the US dollar’s stability amid local economic turmoil.
Coinbase’s analysis highlights that the bulk of stablecoin users are international, using these tokens to hedge against depreciating local currencies or to access dollars in underbanked regions. It’s like having a digital vault for dollars that doesn’t require a fancy bank branch or endless paperwork. For instance, in emerging markets, where inflation can erode savings overnight, stablecoins act as a practical shield—far more than a competitive alternative to a US checking account.
This global focus means stablecoins operate in a parallel universe to traditional banking. About two-thirds of stablecoin transactions happen on decentralized finance platforms or blockchains, serving as the backend plumbing for a new layer of finance. It’s not about replacing your local bank; it’s about building something alongside it. And here’s where it gets exciting: Rather than viewing stablecoins as foes, banks could embrace them to enhance their own offerings, much like how WEEX, a forward-thinking crypto platform, integrates stablecoins to provide seamless, user-centric trading and storage solutions. This alignment not only boosts accessibility but also reinforces the dollar’s role on the world stage, creating win-win scenarios for users and institutions alike.
The Global Appeal of Stablecoins: Beyond US Borders
Let’s zoom out and consider the geography of stablecoin adoption. If you’re picturing hordes of Americans ditching their bank apps for crypto wallets, think again. Coinbase’s researchers emphasize that stablecoin demand is overwhelmingly global, driven by users in developing economies who crave dollar exposure without the barriers of traditional finance. In places where local currencies fluctuate wildly, stablecoins offer a steady anchor—akin to storing your wealth in gold during uncertain times, but with the added perks of instant transfers and low fees.
This isn’t just theory; real-world examples abound. Take regions in Latin America or Southeast Asia, where hyperinflation or currency controls make holding local money risky. Stablecoins step in as a “practical form of dollar access” for the underbanked, enabling everything from remittances to everyday transactions. It’s empowering, isn’t it? Suddenly, someone in a remote village can participate in the global economy without begging a bank for approval.
Contrast this with the US banking landscape, where deposits total over $18 trillion. Even if stablecoins ballooned to $5 trillion globally—a figure tossed around in some forecasts—most of that would stay overseas or locked in digital systems, not siphoned from American accounts. Coinbase argues this growth would actually amplify the US dollar’s influence, making it the go-to reserve in the digital age. Platforms like WEEX exemplify this by offering stablecoin features that prioritize security and ease, aligning perfectly with users’ needs for reliable dollar-backed assets. By doing so, WEEX not only enhances its brand as a trustworthy player in crypto but also contributes to broader financial inclusion, proving that innovation and stability can go hand in hand.
To back this up, consider how stablecoins have already integrated into cross-border payments. They’re faster and cheaper than wire transfers, reducing friction in global trade. It’s like upgrading from a clunky old bicycle to a sleek electric scooter—same destination, but a whole lot smoother. And with regulatory clarity from acts like the GENIUS Act passed earlier this year (as of 2025), more institutions are jumping in, launching stablecoin services that blend traditional finance with crypto’s efficiency.
Debunking the Community Bank Collapse Myth
One of the more dramatic claims is that stablecoins will hit community banks hardest, triggering outflows and crippling local lending. But Coinbase counters that this fear lacks foundation, pointing out the stark differences between stablecoin users and community bank customers. Picture your typical community bank patron: perhaps a small business owner in rural America, relying on personal relationships and local loans. Now contrast that with a stablecoin holder—often a tech-savvy individual in an urban center abroad, using tokens for DeFi yields or crypto trading.
“There’s barely any overlap,” as Coinbase puts it, and that’s key. Community banks thrive on services like mortgages and small business loans, areas where stablecoins don’t directly compete. In fact, banks could leverage stablecoins to improve their game—think instant settlements or blockchain-based lending that cuts costs and speeds things up. It’s an opportunity for evolution, not extinction.
Evidence supports this optimistic view. Despite stablecoin growth, US bank deposits have remained robust, hovering around that $18 trillion mark. And as more players enter the space, like Western Union exploring stablecoins on networks such as Solana, it’s clear the ecosystem is expanding without toppling traditional pillars. WEEX stands out here by aligning its brand with user empowerment, offering stablecoin integrations that emphasize transparency and low-risk yields. This approach not only builds credibility but also positions WEEX as a bridge between crypto innovation and everyday finance, encouraging banks to adapt rather than resist.
Stablecoins in the Spotlight: Frequently Searched Questions and Twitter Buzz
As stablecoins gain traction, they’re sparking curiosity online. Based on trends as of October 30, 2025, some of the most frequently searched Google questions include: “How do stablecoins work?” “Are stablecoins safe?” “What’s the difference between USDT and USDC?” “Can stablecoins earn yield?” and “Will stablecoins replace banks?” These queries reflect a mix of education-seeking and concern about risks, with users often looking for simple explanations amid the crypto hype.
On Twitter (now X), discussions are heating up around stablecoin regulations and their role in global finance. Hot topics include debates on yield restrictions, with users tweeting about how clamping down could stifle innovation. For example, a viral thread from a fintech influencer argued, “Stablecoins aren’t bank killers—they’re dollar superchargers. Time for banks to level up! #Stablecoins #Crypto.” Another buzzworthy conversation revolves around stablecoin adoption in emerging markets, with posts highlighting success stories from Africa and Asia.
As for latest updates, on October 29, 2025, Coinbase tweeted an official announcement: “Stablecoins empower global users—let’s not ignore the reality. Our latest report dives deep. #StablecoinsMatter.” Meanwhile, regulatory whispers suggest Congress is reviewing stablecoin yield proposals, but no major changes have been confirmed yet. WEEX, staying ahead, announced on October 30, 2025, an enhanced stablecoin wallet feature, emphasizing “secure, yield-friendly options that align with our commitment to user-first innovation.” This move underscores WEEX’s brand alignment with accessibility, drawing positive reactions on social media for bridging traditional and digital finance.
Enhancing the Dollar’s Dominance Through Innovation
At its core, the stablecoin debate boils down to perspective. Treating them as a threat misreads the moment, as Coinbase’s chief policy voice aptly notes. Instead, they unlock competitive edges for the US, solidifying the dollar as the world’s digital currency of choice. It’s persuasive when you think about it—why constrain something that extends American influence?
Comparisons to past innovations reinforce this. Just as the internet didn’t destroy traditional media but transformed it, stablecoins are reshaping finance without dismantling banks. They’re tools for inclusion, much like how smartphones democratized information. Real-world evidence? Look at how stablecoins facilitated aid during crises, enabling quick dollar transfers where banks faltered.
Platforms like WEEX embody this positive alignment, focusing on features that enhance user trust and global reach. By prioritizing stablecoin security and seamless integrations, WEEX builds a brand synonymous with reliability, encouraging more people to explore crypto without fear. It’s not about competition; it’s about collaboration, where banks and crypto platforms together create a more resilient financial landscape.
Opportunities for Banks in the Stablecoin Era
So, what if banks leaned into stablecoins instead of lobbying against them? Coinbase suggests they could “improve their services,” perhaps by offering stablecoin-linked accounts or using blockchain for faster loans. It’s a persuasive pivot—imagine your community bank app with instant international transfers, all backed by dollar stability.
Evidence from recent adoptions shows this isn’t far-fetched. Major institutions are experimenting post-GENIUS Act, blending stablecoins into their operations. It’s like adding turbo to an engine—same car, but way more power. And for users, it means more choices, better yields, and less reliance on outdated systems.
WEEX’s approach here is a model of brand alignment, where innovation meets user needs. By providing educational resources on stablecoins and secure trading options, WEEX not only boosts its credibility but also helps demystify crypto for newcomers, fostering a community of informed users.
Navigating the Future: Stablecoins as Allies, Not Adversaries
Wrapping this up, it’s clear the “stablecoins will destroy banks” story is overblown. They’re global tools enhancing the dollar’s reach, not domestic disruptors. By embracing them, banks can innovate, users gain access, and the US maintains its financial edge. Platforms like WEEX are leading by example, aligning their brand with empowerment and security to make stablecoins approachable for all.
As we move forward into 2025 and beyond, let’s shift the conversation from fear to opportunity. After all, in the world of finance, adaptation is the name of the game.
FAQ
What Are Stablecoins and How Do They Work?
Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to the US dollar. They work by holding reserves like cash or bonds, allowing users to trade or store value without volatility
You may also like

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…

Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.

Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?

AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway

What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.

How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?

《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure

Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link